Revolution in Operations Through Evolution in Design

Why Rapax Succeeds Where Others Fail

---

FCAPS

FCAPS—Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, and Security—was the original framework that promised to bring order to network operations. As the oldest of all operational disciplines, fault management was supposed to be the foundation upon which reliable networks were built.

But like most telecom standards, FCAPS became a checkbox exercise rather than a practical solution. Decades later, service providers are still struggling with the same fundamental question: how do you effectively manage faults in increasingly complex networks without drowning in alerts or burning through operational budgets?

The answer isn’t more standards or more staff. It’s intelligence.

The FCAPS Fallacy: Standards Without Solutions

FCAPS, like ITIL after it, was designed as a measuring stick—a way to organize thinking about network operations. From a compliance perspective, it checked all the boxes. From a practical perspective, it created more silos than solutions.

The fundamental problem with traditional fault management isn’t the concept—it’s the execution. Fault management was supposed to be about collecting a comprehensive list of what’s broken in your network. But here’s the reality that every operations team knows: not everything that’s broken needs to be fixed.

Consider the complexity: test systems that are supposed to be offline, non-production environments in various states of configuration, customer endpoints that are intentionally disconnected. These all generate “faults” that can largely be ignored—until they can’t. What happens when a customer brings traffic back online and discovers their connection isn’t working? Suddenly, that ignorable fault becomes a critical issue.

This creates an impossible situation: ignore too many faults and miss critical issues, or monitor everything and drown in noise. Most organizations choose one extreme or the other, neither of which delivers reliable network operations.

The Complexity Cascade

The fault management challenge only gets worse when you consider the device landscape. Modern networks aren’t built from a single vendor’s unified platform—they’re complex ecosystems of routers, switches, servers, and specialty devices from multiple vendors, operating at different network levels, running different software versions.

Each device type speaks its own language. Each vendor implements standards differently. Each software version introduces new message formats and protocols. The result is a landscape of multiple protocols, multiple layers, and multiple message formats that all mean different things—creating exponential complexity that traditional fault management systems simply cannot handle.

This complexity has led many service providers to adopt what we call the “ostrich strategy”—just check if the network is available and can carry traffic, and ignore everything else. If putting your head in the sand seems preferable to dealing with fault management complexity, that tells you everything you need to know about the current state of the industry.

The Body Count Solution

How do most service providers actually handle fault management today? They throw bodies at the problem. Lots of bodies.

When software complexity becomes unmanageable, the default response is to apply double, triple, or even quadruple the manpower “just in case.” Operations centers are staffed with multiple shifts of engineers whose primary job is to manually correlate alerts, determine what’s actually important, and figure out what to do next.

This approach has two fundamental flaws: it’s prohibitively expensive, and it doesn’t scale. As networks grow more complex, the human requirements grow exponentially. Eventually, you reach a point where the operational costs exceed the value of the network itself.

The Standards Trap

The obvious solution would be to create better standards—unified message formats, consistent protocols, standardized responses. But as Linus Torvalds famously observed, “The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from.”

Creating your own standard seems like the answer until you realize what it actually involves: aligning every vendor, device type, model, and message format to your custom approach. If you try to do this internally, you’ll spend more time on standardization than on actual network operations. If you outsource it to vendors, prepare for high costs, poor quality, or standards that don’t actually solve your problems.

The fundamental issue isn’t the lack of standards—it’s that traditional approaches to standardization can’t keep pace with the complexity and evolution of modern networks.

AI: The Game Changer

This is where artificial intelligence fundamentally changes the fault management equation. Instead of trying to force every device and vendor into a rigid standard, AI can create dynamic standards that adapt to whatever your network throws at them.

AI doesn’t just collect fault data—it understands context. It can distinguish between a test system that’s supposed to be offline and a production service that’s unexpectedly down. It can correlate faults across different vendors, protocols, and message formats to identify real issues while filtering out noise.

Most importantly, AI can learn from every fault, every resolution, and every false alarm to continuously improve its understanding of your specific network environment.

How Rapax Revolutionizes Fault Management

Rapax approaches fault management with the understanding that collection is just the beginning. Yes, we collect faults from devices through syslog, SNMP traps, and element management integration—but that’s table stakes.

The real innovation happens in what we do with that data:

Intelligent Discovery and Topology: We don’t just collect device information—we understand the relationships between devices, creating a comprehensive network topology that enables accurate correlation based on each device’s role and position in the network.

Context-Aware Correlation: Our AI doesn’t just match patterns—it understands the operational context of each fault, the cascading effects through network layers, and the business impact of different failure scenarios.

Knowledge Integration: We combine your institutional knowledge with industry best practices, creating AI assistants that understand not just what’s happening, but what should happen next.

Adaptive Standardization: Instead of forcing your network into predetermined standards, Rapax creates and maintains standards that evolve with your environment, ensuring consistent quality without sacrificing flexibility.

The Rapax Advantage

Traditional fault management systems tell you what’s broken. Rapax tells you what matters, why it matters, and what to do about it. We’ve moved beyond simple alerting to intelligent operational guidance that scales with your network complexity rather than being overwhelmed by it.

As leaders in AI-driven network operations, we’re delivering automation outcomes with high levels of quality data matched with accurate correlation. This isn’t just about reducing alert noise—it’s about transforming fault management from a reactive cost center into a proactive competitive advantage.

The future of fault management isn’t about managing more faults more efficiently. It’s about using intelligence to focus on the faults that actually matter, while automating the resolution of everything else.

Join the Revolution

The telecommunications industry has spent decades accepting that fault management must be either incomplete or overwhelming. Rapax proves that’s a false choice. With AI-driven correlation, context-aware alerting, and intelligent automation, effective fault management becomes not just possible, but practical at scale.

Ready to transform your fault management from a necessary evil into a strategic advantage? Contact us at rapax.app to learn how Rapax can revolutionize your network operations.

---

About Citus Technologies

Founded in 2021 and based in Texas, Citus Technologies, LLC is pioneering the future of network operations with its flagship product, Rapax. Taking an AI-native approach to solving long-standing industry challenges, Citus is transforming how service providers manage their network infrastructure, enabling them to deliver superior service quality at a fraction of traditional operational expenses.

Stay ahead of the curve in network operations innovation. Subscribe to our newsletter at rapax.app for the latest insights on AI-driven network management and industry best practices.